From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] [POWERPC] MPC832x_RDB: update dts to use spi, register mmc_spi stub
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:16:04 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070812081604.GA6458@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5cad6d634a7cb6c8c37adbb15db8dfc2@kernel.crashing.org>
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 10:42:51PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>> We should co-ordinate better on this, if it's to become a
> >>> convention...
> >>
> >> That means we shouldn't coordinate on this, right?
> >
> > Heh. Either one is kind of ugly, I'll grant you.
> >
> > But, many SoCs do have a notion of device "number", which is relevant
> > for programming other general control registers in places. We need to
> > encode it somehow, and it would be good to have a consistent way of
> > doing it.
>
> I'm not convinced there isn't a more direct way to represent
> the relevant relationships.
>
> Either way, we don't have enough experience with this stuff
> yet to know what works well and what doesn't (at least, I
> don't, and I haven't seen any evidence that others do); so
> I'd prefer to keep this in per-device bindings for now; it
> should be there anyhow, but once we do have experience with
> it we could do some recommendation.
Well of course it will remain in the per-device bindings. But just
because these are in different per-device bindings doesn't mean we
can't *try* to use consistent property names for similar things...
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-12 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 17:07 [PATCH v3 0/2] SPI support for fsl_soc and mpc832x_rdb Anton Vorontsov
2007-08-08 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] [POWERPC] MPC832x_RDB: update dts to use spi, register mmc_spi stub Anton Vorontsov
2007-08-09 3:07 ` David Gibson
2007-08-09 20:15 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-10 1:02 ` David Gibson
2007-08-10 20:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-12 8:16 ` David Gibson [this message]
2007-08-12 11:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-08 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] [POWERPC] fsl_soc: add support for fsl_spi Anton Vorontsov
2007-08-09 5:33 ` Kumar Gala
2007-08-09 5:34 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] SPI support for fsl_soc and mpc832x_rdb Kumar Gala
2007-08-09 20:21 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070812081604.GA6458@localhost.localdomain \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).