linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: gregkh@suse.de
Cc: stable-commits@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: patch powerpc-fix-size-check-for-hugetlbfs.patch queued to -stable tree
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:45:34 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070814064534.GE8791@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070813234218.4796D14540D0@imap.suse.de>

On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 04:26:27PM -0700, gregkh@suse.de wrote:
> 
> This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
> 
>      Subject: powerpc: Fix size check for hugetlbfs
> 
> to the 2.6.22-stable tree.  Its filename is
> 
>      powerpc-fix-size-check-for-hugetlbfs.patch
> 
> A git repo of this tree can be found at 
>     http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> 
> 
> >From benh@kernel.crashing.org  Mon Aug 13 16:17:09 2007
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:44:15 +1000
> Subject: powerpc: Fix size check for hugetlbfs
> To: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, stable@kernel.org
> Message-ID: <1186551855.938.164.camel@localhost.localdomain>
> 
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> 
> My "slices" address space management code that was added in 2.6.22
> implementation of get_unmapped_area() doesn't properly check that the
> size is a multiple of the requested page size. This allows userland to
> create VMAs that aren't a multiple of the huge page size with hugetlbfs
> (since hugetlbfs entirely relies on get_unmapped_area() to do that
> checking) which leads to a kernel BUG() when such areas are torn down.

Ok, I said I was going to look into a libhugetlbfs testcase for this.
Doesn't appear there's specifically a testcase for misaligned size -
I'll add one.

However, it seems the current kernel, on ppc64, gives a testcase
failure on 'misaligned_offset', because it's not failing a mapping
with a non-hugepage aligned file offset.  I'm not sure (yet) if this
failure is also caused by the new slice code, but it seems a likely
candidate.

Still investigating...

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-14  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-08  5:44 [PATCH] powerpc: Fix size check for hugetlbfs Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-08-13 23:26 ` patch powerpc-fix-size-check-for-hugetlbfs.patch queued to -stable tree gregkh
2007-08-14  6:45   ` David Gibson [this message]
2007-08-14  7:48     ` David Gibson
2007-08-16  3:53       ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070814064534.GE8791@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).