From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from outbound5-blu-R.bigfish.com (outbound-blu.frontbridge.com [65.55.251.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.bigfish.com", Issuer "*.bigfish.com" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D370DDE46 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 02:14:33 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: RE: Device Tree tool [was RE: [PATCH] Consolidate XILINX_VIRTEXboardsupport] Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:14:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: <2934.5453-20654-824518122-1187160093@seznam.cz> From: "Stephen Neuendorffer" To: "Michal Simek" Message-Id: <20070815161429.17C80EF8057@mail82-blu.bigfish.com> Cc: microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I don't have an EDK script. I'm currently using a hacked version of=20 Grant's gen_mhs_devtree.py script, and then I modified the resulting device tree in an effort to get things working. In the long term, I think having an EDK script will be necessary to ensure that all of the information is in the device tree. Michal: what do you need from me? Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Michal Simek [mailto:Monstr@seznam.cz]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 11:42 PM > To: Stephen Neuendorffer > Cc: Grant Likely; microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au;=20 > linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > Subject: RE: Device Tree tool [was RE: [PATCH] Consolidate=20 > XILINX_VIRTEXboardsupport] >=20 > Hi, >=20 > >I've managed to get the first step working: a microblaze system > >advertising of_devices in 2.6 using a flat device tree. =20 >=20 > It's great news. >=20 > >Is there a concensus on how microblaze systems should get booted? > >Currently, > >I'm linking the device tree directly into the kernel itself,=20 > loading the > >whole > >mess using SystemAce and the start address jumps directly into the > >kernel, which > >is quite a bit different than the way powerpc works. It's certainly > >simpler: > >maybe too simple. At the same time, replicating > >the complexity of arch/powerpc with separate boot code may=20 > or may not be > >worth it... > >Any thoughts? >=20 > Microblaze can be boot via U-BOOT. U-BOOT supports FDT for=20 > some PowerPC boards. > I would like to help with this part of bootloader code.=20 >=20 > Do you have any EDK script for generation FDT?=20 >=20 > Best regards, > Michal Simek >=20 >=20