From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] Remove need for include/asm-ppc
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:37:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070820103719.23f50f64@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A4E8D00C-87DB-4C59-A6C4-70D437ED9988@kernel.crashing.org>
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:32:43 -0500
Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Aug 20, 2007, at 1:00 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 12:05:36PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> This patch series removes the need for include/asm-ppc in the
> >> ARCH=powerpc
> >> build for ppc32. They exist in the following git tree:
> >>
> >> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git
> >> for-2.6.24
> >>
> >> posting here for everyone else to see.
> >>
> >> Updated with changes suggested by Arnd & Segher. (removal 82xx pci
> >> header
> >> and moving some headers under platforms if not globally needed).
> >
> > Nice! I'm hoping the next step after this is to do the other way
> > around - make ARCH=ppc builds independent of things in arch/powerpc or
> > include/asm-powerpc, which is almost the more important change.
>
> Maybe, hadn't thought about that case. One thing at a time :)
>
> Do we want to go and move stuff back out of arch/powerpc/kernel back
> into arch/ppc/kernel? or just include files?
What would be the point of doing that? I would think we want the
opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during
arch/ppc compiles as possible. Sort of shows how much is "left" to
port.
Also, making arch/ppc compile stand-alone again would be "wasted" work,
since it's going to die anyway.
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-20 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-18 17:05 [PATCH 0/3 v2] Remove need for include/asm-ppc Kumar Gala
2007-08-18 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2][POWERPC] Remove old includes from arch/ppc Kumar Gala
2007-08-18 17:09 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2][POWERPC] Copy over headers from arch/ppc to arch/powerpc that we need Kumar Gala
2007-08-18 17:11 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2][POWERPC] Stop include asm-ppc when building ARCH=powerpc for ppc32 Kumar Gala
2007-08-20 5:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-08-20 5:57 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-08-20 15:29 ` Kumar Gala
2007-08-20 15:28 ` Kumar Gala
2007-08-20 6:00 ` [PATCH 0/3 v2] Remove need for include/asm-ppc David Gibson
2007-08-20 15:32 ` Kumar Gala
2007-08-20 15:37 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2007-08-20 15:44 ` Scott Wood
2007-08-20 15:53 ` Josh Boyer
2007-08-20 22:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-21 1:47 ` David Gibson
2007-08-21 2:47 ` Josh Boyer
2007-08-21 2:50 ` David Gibson
2007-08-21 12:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-08-21 12:56 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070820103719.23f50f64@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com \
--to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).