From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e34.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F27BDDE2E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:37:25 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7KFbMAc032604 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:37:22 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l7KFbL1g212914 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:37:21 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l7KFbLf0028967 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 09:37:21 -0600 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:37:19 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] Remove need for include/asm-ppc Message-ID: <20070820103719.23f50f64@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20070820060000.GA26100@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:32:43 -0500 Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2007, at 1:00 AM, David Gibson wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 12:05:36PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> This patch series removes the need for include/asm-ppc in the > >> ARCH=powerpc > >> build for ppc32. They exist in the following git tree: > >> > >> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git > >> for-2.6.24 > >> > >> posting here for everyone else to see. > >> > >> Updated with changes suggested by Arnd & Segher. (removal 82xx pci > >> header > >> and moving some headers under platforms if not globally needed). > > > > Nice! I'm hoping the next step after this is to do the other way > > around - make ARCH=ppc builds independent of things in arch/powerpc or > > include/asm-powerpc, which is almost the more important change. > > Maybe, hadn't thought about that case. One thing at a time :) > > Do we want to go and move stuff back out of arch/powerpc/kernel back > into arch/ppc/kernel? or just include files? What would be the point of doing that? I would think we want the opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during arch/ppc compiles as possible. Sort of shows how much is "left" to port. Also, making arch/ppc compile stand-alone again would be "wasted" work, since it's going to die anyway. josh