From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ausmtp06.au.ibm.com (ausmtp06.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ausmtp06.au.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03082DDDCA for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:20:23 +1000 (EST) Received: from sd0109e.au.ibm.com (d23rh905.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.225]) by ausmtp06.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l7L1qRtW6267012 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:52:27 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.242]) by sd0109e.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l7L1rX2D152990 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:53:33 +1000 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l7L1nxdo000423 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:50:00 +1000 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:47:07 +1000 From: David Gibson To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] Remove need for include/asm-ppc Message-ID: <20070821014707.GA15469@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070820060000.GA26100@localhost.localdomain> <20070820103719.23f50f64@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> <46C9B6DF.1000006@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <46C9B6DF.1000006@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 10:44:31AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:32:43 -0500 > > Kumar Gala wrote: > >>Do we want to go and move stuff back out of arch/powerpc/kernel back > >>into arch/ppc/kernel? or just include files? > > > > > > What would be the point of doing that? I would think we want the > > opposite, in that we want to reuse as much of arch/powerpc during > > arch/ppc compiles as possible. Sort of shows how much is "left" to > > port. > > The point would be to keep the two trees separate, so that one > doesn't need to worry about breaking arch/ppc when making a change > to arch/powerpc. Exactly so. Having to be careful about not breaking arch/ppc when doing cleanups for arch/powerpc is a pain in the bum. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson