From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Stefan Roese To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [POWERPC] Add PCI support for AMCC 440EPx (sequoia) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:05:19 +0200 References: <20070825091440.4087.1428.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070827015719.GD12804@localhost.localdomain> <20070827105507.768b1aad@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20070827105507.768b1aad@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200708271005.19740.sr@denx.de> Cc: David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday 27 August 2007, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:57:19 +1000 > > David Gibson wrote: > > > + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > > > (at your > > > + * option) any later version. > > > + */ > > > > Unless there really is something peculiar about the EPx bridge > > compared to say the GP, EP and other 4xx bridges, this should have a > > more general name. > > well, I'd rather extend the name once/when it would be validated to work on > those GR, EP etc. But, if preferred, it does not hurt to change all the > prefixes to ppc4xx_ with such a sole implementation, and fork() if required > later. > > opinions? I would prefer to move to a more generic name now (as already suggest). Perhaps somebody (Josh?) has a chance to test this on Bamboo (440EP) soon. Best regards, Stefan