From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e36.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B922DDDF1E for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 23:41:56 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l86DfX7j001420 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:41:33 -0400 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l86DfXce354100 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:41:33 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l86DfWLU017842 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:41:32 -0600 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 08:41:09 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: Valentine Barshak Subject: Re: OF NDFC Message-ID: <20070906084109.315544ea@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <46E000E0.4080203@ru.mvista.com> References: <20070905181703.GA30904@ru.mvista.com> <20070905160008.201a243a@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <20070906081732.079bc45d@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <46E000E0.4080203@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:30:08 +0400 Valentine Barshak wrote: > AFAIK, NAND flash is autodetected by reading it's ID at runtime, so > there should be no need for flash bindings. Well, I'm not really sure. CFI and JEDEC can both be probed as well, and we're working on a binding there. But if you think you can come up with a driver for NDFC that doesn't require some kind of device tree description of the devices it controls, then by all means go for it. josh