From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from picasso.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CEEDDDFE for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:28:39 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:27:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070912.062732.68054135.davem@davemloft.net> To: RAISCH@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: new NAPI interface broken for POWER architecture? From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <200709071137.02801.ossthema@de.ibm.com> <20070912.055004.88490155.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ossthema@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pmac@au1.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, THEMANN@de.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, ARNDB@de.ibm.com, ellerman@au1.ibm.com, shemminger@linux-foundation.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Christoph Raisch Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:10:08 +0200 > This is definitely not something we can change in the HEA device driver > alone. And it shouldn't be, x86 implements the policy in irq balance daemon, powerpc should do it wherever it would be appropriate there. > Paul, Michael, Arndt, what is your opinion here? I'm all ears too :)