From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e36.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B42BDDE08 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:37:35 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8EIbCP2026543 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:37:12 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l8EIbCFJ413680 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:37:12 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l8EIbB3w018016 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:37:11 -0600 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:37:10 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: Please pull from for-2.6.24 Message-ID: <20070914133710.541f0dbb@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <16B381A2-66F5-4E7A-BDDC-6E536296C933@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20070914122510.6dffb747@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> <16B381A2-66F5-4E7A-BDDC-6E536296C933@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org list" , Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:24:17 -0500 Kumar Gala wrote: > >>> Roy Zang (1): > >>> [POWERPC] Update mpc7448hpc2 device tree to be compatible for > >>> tsi109 chip > >> > >> Dropped for now. I doubt we want this based on Segher's comments. > >> (pretty sure its a ts108 on the hpc2 board). > > > > It is a tsi108 on hpc2. Holly has tsi109. From a Linux perspective, > > there is no difference. And the comment Segher made on the list was > > "Looks good, thanks!" So what other comment are you talking about? > > I think that was to the .dts clean ups. The patch from Roy wasn't > part of that. > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-September/042499.html Nope, on the original patch: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-July/039289.html Guess Segher changed his mind :) > But, I think segher is right in saying we should have tsi109 props if > the HW is actually tsi108. Yeah, that's probably true. josh