From: Vitaly Bordug <vitb@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Valentine Barshak <vbarshak@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC][POWERPC] Merge 32 and 64 bit pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges() instances
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:27:04 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070918182704.640c677f@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46EFBEA6.4050406@ru.mvista.com>
Hello Valentine,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:03:50 +0400
Valentine Barshak wrote:
> Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> > +
> > + hose->io_base_phys = cpu_phys_addr - pci_addr;
>
> This is not gonna work on 32-bit platform (unless pci_addr == 0).
> Should be
> hose->io_base_phys = cpu_phys_addr;
> The other way we should adjust io size like we do on 64-bit and rewrite
> resource fixup functions.
>
I think the second sounds like a plan then. We should not "assume" where we can make things to behave properly.
> > + /* handle from 0 to top of I/O window */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> > + hose->pci_io_size = pci_addr + size;
> > +#endif
> > + hose->io_base_virt = ioremap(hose->io_base_phys, size);
>
> Do we need to ioremap on 64-bit? I think 64-bit uses different approach
> in handling io space.
>
Correct - 64 bit code does __get_vm_area() so the upper line is ppc32-specific.
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
> > + if (prim)
> > + isa_io_base = (unsigned long)hose->io_base_virt;
> > +#endif
>
> What's exactly the point of merging this single function?
> If this was intended to add 64-bit physical address support to 32-bit
> platforms (like ppc440), then it does not seem sufficient to make pci
> stuff work right.
> What about the 32-bit pcibios_fixup_resources(),
> pcibios_resource_to_bus(), pcibios_bus_to_resource() stuff?
> There's still no 64-bit support. You'll get
> "PCI Cannot allocate resource region" attempting to initialize resources
> at PCI start-up.
Because this function is critical to get the stuff going. You can have some devices working even without PCI resources initted
(what in fact I had with mpc8272). I am in process of moving the mentioned to the common_... domain but I suspect there are other 32-bit-stick stuff still. So if you want to assist in cleaning this up, feel free to join the club...
--
Sincerely, Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-18 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-11 22:49 [PATCH] [RFC][POWERPC] Merge 32 and 64 bit pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges() instances Vitaly Bordug
2007-09-11 22:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-09-11 23:56 ` Vitaly Bordug
2007-09-12 8:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-09-12 14:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-09-12 16:07 ` Vitaly Bordug
2007-09-13 5:11 ` David Gibson
2007-09-18 12:03 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-09-18 14:27 ` Vitaly Bordug [this message]
2007-09-18 14:38 ` Valentine Barshak
2007-09-19 0:09 ` Vitaly Bordug
2007-09-18 21:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-09-18 21:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-09-18 21:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070918182704.640c677f@localhost.localdomain \
--to=vitb@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=vbarshak@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).