From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3208DDE07 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:09:49 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:09:40 +0400 From: Vitaly Bordug To: Valentine Barshak Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC][POWERPC] Merge 32 and 64 bit pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges() instances Message-ID: <20070919040940.557ad12f@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <46EFE300.1090108@ru.mvista.com> References: <20070911224952.9838.46644.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <46EFBEA6.4050406@ru.mvista.com> <20070918182704.640c677f@localhost.localdomain> <46EFE300.1090108@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello Valentine, On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:38:56 +0400 Valentine Barshak wrote: > Well, thanks for the invitation :) > I've been trying to work on the pci support here too. But I've used a > bit different approach. I tried to add 64-bit phys addr support to > pci_32.c. The patch seems to work on Sequoia. Actually, I thought > merging was too risky at this point and might cause more problems > breaking both 64 and 32-bit pci support. In order not to break, we just need same functionality and it is not that complex. I began with the upper approach as well, but that seems more like a workaround, than a step forward. -- Sincerely, Vitaly