cuImage generation

cuImage generation

[Gerhard Pircher]

Hi,

I tried to compile a 2.6.23-rc6 kernel yesterday, but wasn't able to get a
cuImage.<platform) out of it (only the uImage file was generated). My
platform config defines DEFAULT_UIMAGE and WANT_DEVICE_TREE. Do I need to
generate it manually or is there a makefile where I have to specify it?
Naturally I added my cuboot wrapper code to the arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile.

Thanks!

regards,

Gerhard
-- 
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! 
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer

Re: cuImage generation

[Scott Wood]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:28:31AM +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
> I tried to compile a 2.6.23-rc6 kernel yesterday, but wasn't able to get a
> cuImage.<platform) out of it (only the uImage file was generated). My
> platform config defines DEFAULT_UIMAGE and WANT_DEVICE_TREE. Do I need to
> generate it manually or is there a makefile where I have to specify it?
> Naturally I added my cuboot wrapper code to the arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile.

Did you specify a device tree to use in CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE?

-Scott

Re: cuImage generation

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> writes:

 Scott> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:28:31AM +0200, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
 >> I tried to compile a 2.6.23-rc6 kernel yesterday, but wasn't able to get a
 >> cuImage.<platform) out of it (only the uImage file was generated). My
 >> platform config defines DEFAULT_UIMAGE and WANT_DEVICE_TREE. Do I need to
 >> generate it manually or is there a makefile where I have to specify it?
 >> Naturally I added my cuboot wrapper code to the arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile.

I have the same problem here..

 Scott> Did you specify a device tree to use in CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE?

Yes.

% grep TREE .config
CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE=y
CONFIG_WANT_DEVICE_TREE=y
CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE="mpc8349emitx.dts"

How is it supposed to work now cuImage no longer is in BOOT_TARGETS?
What make target are you supposed to work. It works if I add
cuImage.83xx to BOOT_TARGETS and call make cuImage.83xx, but that can
hardly be the correct way?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

Re: cuImage generation

[Scott Wood]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:53:14PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> How is it supposed to work now cuImage no longer is in BOOT_TARGETS?
> What make target are you supposed to work. It works if I add
> cuImage.83xx to BOOT_TARGETS and call make cuImage.83xx, but that can
> hardly be the correct way?

Ah, OK -- you need to type make zImage, not make uImage.

-Scott

Re: cuImage generation

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> writes:

 Scott> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:53:14PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
 >> How is it supposed to work now cuImage no longer is in BOOT_TARGETS?
 >> What make target are you supposed to work. It works if I add
 >> cuImage.83xx to BOOT_TARGETS and call make cuImage.83xx, but that can
 >> hardly be the correct way?

 Scott> Ah, OK -- you need to type make zImage, not make uImage.

Ahh, I got fooled by the platform selecting DEFAULT_UIMAGE - Thanks!

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

Re: cuImage generation

[Gerhard Pircher]

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:20:23 +0200
> Von: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
> An: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> CC: Gerhard Pircher <gerhard_pircher@gmx.net>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Betreff: Re: cuImage generation

> >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> writes:
> 
>  Scott> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 04:53:14PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>  >> How is it supposed to work now cuImage no longer is in BOOT_TARGETS?
>  >> What make target are you supposed to work. It works if I add
>  >> cuImage.83xx to BOOT_TARGETS and call make cuImage.83xx, but that can
>  >> hardly be the correct way?
> 
>  Scott> Ah, OK -- you need to type make zImage, not make uImage.
> 
> Ahh, I got fooled by the platform selecting DEFAULT_UIMAGE - Thanks!
I also thought I have to use "make uImage", because of DEFAULT_UIMAGE.

Thanks!

Gerhard
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kanns mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger