From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB077DDE35 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:26:23 +1000 (EST) From: Arnd Bergmann To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] PowerPC64: Not to insert EA=0 entry at initializing SLB Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:15:34 +0200 References: <20070926.132034.-1300539325.kouish@swc.toshiba.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20070926.132034.-1300539325.kouish@swc.toshiba.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200709261415.35404.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Ishizaki Kou wrote: > This is a workaround NOT to insert EA=0 entry at initializing SLB. > Without this patch, you can see /sbin/init hanging at a machine > which has less or equal than 256MB memory. Can you elaborate? I don't understand why /sbin/init will hang because of an incorrect SLB entry, or how that entry gets initialized from get_paca()->kstack. Are you still trying to find a better fix for 2.6.24, or do you intend to have this patch go in for now? Also, I did not get a patch 4/7 and 5/7. Did you send them to some other mailing list, or did they get lost on the way? Arnd <><