From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61407DDE04 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:25:13 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:28:30 -0500 From: Olof Johansson To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add platform support for the MPC837x RDB board Message-ID: <20070927212830.GA9610@lixom.net> References: <11909173512321-git-send-email-ljd015@freescale.com> <20070927191036.GD7838@mag.az.mvista.com> <20070927195351.GE7838@mag.az.mvista.com> <20070927150312.4eea96fd@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070927150312.4eea96fd@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> Cc: D'Abbraccio Joe-ljd015 , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:03:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:53:51 -0700 > "Mark A. Greer" wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:41:57PM -0700, D'Abbraccio Joe-ljd015 wrote: > > > Thanks for the advice, but I was just basing the list to post to on the > > > MAINTAINERS file which states that this is the one for Embedded PPC83XX. > > > If you still think that I should post to linuxppc-dev, let me know. > > > > Yes, I think it would be better to repost to linuxppc-dev. > > > > Does anyone have an objection to changing all of the: > > > > "L: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org" > > > > in MAINTAINERS to: > > > > "L: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" ?? > > > > Kumar, Josh, Vitaly, et. al.? > > I personally don't care either way. I'm already subscribed to both > lists. > > Makes sense to go to linuxppc-dev given the arch/powerpc migration. I thought the -embedded list was created in the first place to keep some of the "noise" off of -dev (i.e. "I can't get interface to work on my custom -lookalike board, HELP!"). If people still care about keeping that on a separate list, then we shouldn't change it. I think the relevant people probably monitor this list (maybe not quite as frequently) to catch things. I even caught the first PWRficient-related question in a timely manner the other day. :-) Still, that being said, patches will clearly get better exposure on -dev, especially device tree crap. -Olof