From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from metis.extern.pengutronix.de (metis.extern.pengutronix.de [83.236.181.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D745DDDF7 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:07:56 +1000 (EST) Received: from themisto.extern.pengutronix.de ([83.236.181.29] helo=localhost) by metis.extern.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IbHRT-0003Ck-14 for linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:07:51 +0200 From: Juergen Beisert To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:07:44 +0200 References: <20070810095153.GC13994@moe.telargo.com> <200709271907.50479.jbe@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <200709271907.50479.jbe@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200709281707.45030.jbe@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0.1] net driver: mpc52xx fec List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 27 September 2007 19:07, Juergen Beisert wrote: > On Friday 10 August 2007 11:51, Domen Puncer wrote: > > Not for merge (yet)! But please do review. > > > > fec_mpc52xx driver (not in-tree, but floating around) isn't in very > > good shape, so I tried to change that. > > Diff against original is quite big (fec_phy.c is completely rewritten) > > and confuzing, so I'm including whole drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx/ . > > > > I still have 'make CONFIG_FEC_MPC52xx_MDIO=3Dn compile and work' on my > > TODO, maybe even ethtool support. I add a few more debug outputs and now with this driver I can run a $ nmap from my host against the target and target's network stops always at the sa= me=20 point. The last output from the driver is (with DEBUG macro defined): net eth0: ievent: 08020000 and no further interrupt occurs anymore (I checked all three interrupt entr= y=20 functions) nmap on host's side outputs: Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org ) at 2007-09-28 16:56 CEST Interesting ports on 192.168.23.226: Not shown: 852 filtered ports, 843 closed ports PORT STATE SERVICE 22/tcp open ssh 23/tcp open telnet Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 14.120 seconds But I can't run it a second time, as the network on target's side doesn't=20 respond. Any idea? Juergen =2D-=20 Dipl.-Ing. Juergen Beisert | http://www.pengutronix.de =A0Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry =A0 Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 =A0 =A0 =A0 Vertretung Sued/Muenchen, Germany Phone: +49-8766-939 228 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9