From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611CCDDE02 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:49:30 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:49:17 +0400 From: Vitaly Bordug To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpm: Describe multi-user ram in its own device node. Message-ID: <20070929104917.1585737e@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <08C0C9CB-C958-4B95-81B8-D0677CBA4399@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20070928190616.GB20213@loki.buserror.net> <20070929003005.59afc2a0@kernel.crashing.org> <08C0C9CB-C958-4B95-81B8-D0677CBA4399@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: PowerPC dev list , Timur Tabi List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello Kumar, On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:53:38 -0500 Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Sep 28, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > > > Kumar, > > > > Realizing this may suffer a bit from cleanest-dts flame war, but > > anyway I pretty much see a lot of > > sense in getting this in during next merge window. Is this possible? > > Probably, does QE have muram? I can't keep these things straight. > cpms have dpram, qe has muram. these two are the same stuff in fact. Or you are asking about have QE stuff utilize such a binding at the same pass? -- Sincerely, Vitaly