From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e32.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DBEDDD0C for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2007 02:03:31 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l95Esxn2018060 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:54:59 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l95G3NYs373794 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:03:24 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l95G3MWm026754 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 10:03:23 -0600 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:03:22 -0500 To: Nish Aravamudan Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc7-mm1 -- powerpc rtas panic Message-ID: <20071005160322.GN4338@austin.ibm.com> References: <20070924021716.9bfe7dfb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070924123531.GC30855@shadowen.org> <20071002232819.GN4338@austin.ibm.com> <20071003002646.GD9814@bakeyournoodle.com> <1191371416.8073.1.camel@concordia> <20071003011909.GG9814@bakeyournoodle.com> <29495f1d0710041701g4ed73441ie583058c78f95857@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <29495f1d0710041701g4ed73441ie583058c78f95857@mail.gmail.com> From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:01:47PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On 10/2/07, Tony Breeds wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:30:16AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > > > I realise it'll make the patch bigger, but this doesn't seem like a > > > particularly good name for the variable anymore. > > > > Sure, what about? > > > > Clarify when RTAS logging is enabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds > > For what it's worth, on a different ppc64 box, this resolves a similar > panic for me. > > Tested-by: Nishanth Aravamudan For the reasons explained, I'd really like to nack Tony's patch. --linas