From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:02:37 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: Build failure on treeboot-walnut.cg Message-ID: <20071011200237.GB4247@loki.buserror.net> References: <470AA224.7050709@freescale.com> <20071009030729.GI12499@localhost.localdomain> <470BA6ED.3020504@freescale.com> <18189.27251.48582.614106@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <18189.27251.48582.614106@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.com, Timur Tabi , David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:12:35AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Timur Tabi writes: > > > Is this a new policy? Modules in the kernel are not built unless you want > > them. Even in arch/powerpc/platforms, only the specific platform file I'm > > targeting is built. So I don't really understand why you claim it's normal > > for platform-specific files to be built, regardless of the actual platform. > > The wrapper script is intended to be a standalone tool which is > independent of the kernel configuration, and can be used separately > from the kernel build process. Is it ever actually used that way? I wonder if this "intent" is worth the pain... -Scott