From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from archon.plz.fr (archon.plz.fr [194.50.78.210]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27759DDE17 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:12:50 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:12:47 +0200 To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] bestcomm: core bestcomm support for Freescale MPC5200 Message-ID: <20071015061246.GA25751@powerlinux.fr> References: <20071014044041.23438.14070.stgit@trillian.cg.shawcable.net> <20071014044205.23438.36036.stgit@trillian.cg.shawcable.net> <20071014113336.GA23286@powerlinux.fr> <20071014202535.GA29218@powerlinux.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: From: Sven Luther Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, domen.puncer@telargo.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 03:23:21PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On 10/14/07, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 02:22:16PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > > On 10/14/07, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 10:42:05PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > > > > From: Sylvain Munaut > > > > > > > > > > This patch adds support for the core of the BestComm API > > > > > for the Freescale MPC5200(b). The BestComm engine is a > > > > > microcode-controlled / tasks-based DMA used by several > > > > > of the onchip devices. > > > > > > > > > > Setting up the tasks / memory allocation and all common > > > > > low level functions are handled by this patch. > > > > > The specifics details of each tasks and their microcode > > > > > are split-out in separate patches. > > > > > > > > > > This is not the official API, but a much cleaner one. > > > > > (hopefully) > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sylvain Munaut > > > > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely > > > > > > > > Hi Grant, ... > > > > > > > > I am unsure if this is a regression with regard to Sylvain's patch, or > > > > somethign else, but it is no more possible to build bestcomm modular : > > > > > > Hmmm, interesting. I'll try that out here this afternoon. > > > > Notice that domen said it was working, so it could have been a > > mismanipulation on my part, or some problem with the debian patches. > > > > The older patchset with 2.6.23-rc6 worked fine though, and making the > > main bestcomm module builtin solved the error messages. I did not spot > > anything obvious when looking at the code. > > Yes, it is a regression. There had been a change to the Makefile. > I've reverted it and it works fine now. I'll repost v3 shortly. Ok, thanks. Friendly, Sven Luther