boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Kumar Gala]

Guys,

I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in  
arch/powerpc:

* STX GP3
* TQM 85xx
* SBC 8560

I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David does.

I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some  
help testing.

- k

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Kumar,

in message <7DBC0977-0367-40F5-8A30-ACA02FD4E9FA@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
> 
> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in  
> arch/powerpc:
> 
...
> * TQM 85xx
...

We definitely care about the TQM8xx{L,M,D}, TQM5200, TQM82xx, TQM834x,
TQM85xx and TQM86xx boards.

> I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some  
> help testing.

Ah! Excellent!

As for 85xx, I can test any time on  TQM8540,  TQM8541,  TQM8555  and
TQM8560.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
"The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who, in  times  of
moral crisis, preserved their neutrality."                    - Dante

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Dan Malek]

On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:07 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:

> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
> arch/powerpc:
>
> * STX GP3

I have GP3 and GP3-SSA for testing.
If you can make a first pass at the changes
I'll debug and finish.

Thanks.

	-- Dan

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Stefan Roese]

Hi Kumar,

On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
> arch/powerpc:
>
> * STX GP3
> * TQM 85xx
> * SBC 8560
>
> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David does.
>
> I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some
> help testing.

Yes, it would be greatly appreciated if you could start this TQM85xx port. I 
will of course do the testing.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Stefan

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Kumar Gala]

On Oct 15, 2007, at 11:40 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:

> Hi Kumar,
>
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
>> arch/powerpc:
>>
>> * STX GP3
>> * TQM 85xx
>> * SBC 8560
>>
>> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David  
>> does.
>>
>> I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some
>> help testing.
>
> Yes, it would be greatly appreciated if you could start this  
> TQM85xx port. I
> will of course do the testing.

Ok, for the TQM85xx code in arch/ppc can I get a few things from you:

1. what processors does this actually support/run on.  I'm guessing  
MPC8541, MPC8555?  But not really sure
2. can you send the results of a bd_info from u-boot on the board
3. can you send me the results of cat /proc/iomem & /proc/ioports  
from a linux boot.

thanks

- k

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Stefan Roese]

On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some
> >> help testing.
> >
> > Yes, it would be greatly appreciated if you could start this
> > TQM85xx port. I
> > will of course do the testing.
>
> Ok, for the TQM85xx code in arch/ppc can I get a few things from you:
>
> 1. what processors does this actually support/run on.  I'm guessing
> MPC8541, MPC8555?  But not really sure

IIRC there are 4 different versions of the board:
- 8540, 8541, 8555 & 8560

> 2. can you send the results of a bd_info from u-boot on the board

I have two version available right now

8540:

U-Boot 1.3.0-rc2-g527c80f0-dirty (Oct  5 2007 - 15:57:38)

CPU:   8540, Version: 2.0, (0x80300020)
Core:  E500, Version: 2.0, (0x80200020)
Clock Configuration:
       CPU: 833 MHz, CCB: 333 MHz,
       DDR: 166 MHz, LBC:  41 MHz
L1:    D-cache 32 kB enabled
       I-cache 32 kB enabled
Board: TQM8540, serial# TQM8540DCBAD7-APFBC.0204 11341240 4
PCI1:  32 bit, 33 MHz (compiled)
I2C:   ready
DTT:   1 is 31 C
DRAM:  256 MB (CL=2.5)
FLASH: 32 MB
L2 cache 256KB: enabled
In:    serial
Out:   serial
Err:   serial
Net:   TSEC0, TSEC1, FEC
PS/2:  No device found
Kbd:   reset failed, no ACK

Type run flash_nfs to mount root filesystem over NFS

=> bdinfo
memstart    = 0x00000000
memsize     = 0x10000000
flashstart  = 0xFE000000
flashsize   = 0x02000000
flashoffset = 0x00000000
sramstart   = 0x00000000
sramsize    = 0x00000000
immr_base   = 0xE0000000
bootflags   = 0xE4013F80
intfreq     = 833.333 MHz
busfreq     = 333.333 MHz
ethaddr     = 00:D0:93:08:12:E2
eth1addr    = 00:D0:93:08:12:E3
eth2addr    = 00:D0:93:08:12:E4
IP addr     = 192.168.210.1
baudrate    = 115200 bps


8560:

U-Boot 1.2.0-ge9792fc6 (Aug  7 2007 - 08:43:55)

CPU:   8560, Version: 2.0, (0x80700020)
Core:  E500, Version: 2.0, (0x80200020)
Clock Configuration:
       CPU: 833 MHz, CCB: 333 MHz,
       DDR: 166 MHz, LBC:  41 MHz
L1:    D-cache 32 kB enabled
       I-cache 32 kB enabled
Board: TQM8560, serial# TQM8560DCBAD7-APFBC.0204 11301266 4
PCI1:  32 bit, 33 MHz (compiled)
I2C:   ready
DTT:   1 is 22 C
DRAM:  256 MB (CL=2.5)
FLASH: 32 MB
L2 cache 256KB: enabled
In:    serial
Out:   serial
Err:   serial
Net:   TSEC0, TSEC1, FCC3 ETHERNET

Type run flash_nfs to mount root filesystem over NFS

Hit any key to stop autoboot:  0
=> bdinfo
memstart    = 0x00000000
memsize     = 0x10000000
flashstart  = 0xFE000000
flashsize   = 0x02000000
flashoffset = 0x00000000
sramstart   = 0x00000000
sramsize    = 0x00000000
immr_base   = 0xE0000000
bootflags   = 0x00000036
vco         = 666.666 MHz
sccfreq     = 166.666 MHz
brgfreq     = 166.666 MHz
intfreq     = 833.333 MHz
cpmfreq     = 333.333 MHz
busfreq     = 333.333 MHz
ethaddr     = 16:CC:31:E8:8C:12
eth1addr    = 16:CC:31:E8:8C:13
eth2addr    = 16:CC:31:E8:8C:14
IP addr     = 192.168.210.2
baudrate    = 115200 bps


> 3. can you send me the results of cat /proc/iomem & /proc/ioports
> from a linux boot.

8540:

bash-3.00# cat /proc/iomem
80000000-9fffffff : PCI1 host bridge
  9fff8000-9fff9fff : 0000:00:1c.1
  9fffbc00-9fffbfff : 0000:00:1c.1
  9fffc000-9fffdfff : 0000:00:1c.0
  9ffffc00-9fffffff : 0000:00:1c.0
e0003000-e00030ff : fsl-i2c.1
e0004500-e0004507 : serial
e0004600-e0004607 : serial
e0021100-e002117f : fsl-dma.0
e0021180-e00211ff : fsl-dma.1
e0021200-e002127f : fsl-dma.2
e0021280-e00212ff : fsl-dma.3
e0024000-e0024fff : fsl-gianfar.1
  e0024520-e002453f : fsl-gianfar_mdio.0
e0025000-e0025fff : fsl-gianfar.2
e0026000-e0026fff : fsl-gianfar.3
e00e1000-e00e1fff : fsl-perfmon.1
bash-3.00# cat /proc/ioports
00000000-00ffffff : PCI1 host bridge
  00fffe00-00fffeff : 0000:00:1c.1
  00ffff00-00ffffff : 0000:00:1c.0


8560:

-bash-3.2# cat /proc/iomem
80000000-9fffffff : PCI1 host bridge
  9f7fdf00-9f7fdfff : 0000:00:1c.0
  9fbfe000-9fbfefff : 0000:00:0b.1
  9ffff000-9fffffff : 0000:00:0b.0
e0003000-e00030ff : fsl-i2c.1
e0021100-e002117f : fsl-dma.0
e0021180-e00211ff : fsl-dma.1
e0021200-e002127f : fsl-dma.2
e0021280-e00212ff : fsl-dma.3
e0024000-e0024fff : fsl-gianfar.1
  e0024520-e002453f : fsl-gianfar_mdio.0
e0025000-e0025fff : fsl-gianfar.2
e0088400-e00884ff : fcc_pram
e0088500-e00885ff : fcc_pram
e0088600-e00886ff : fcc_pram
e0091300-e009131f : fcc_regs
e0091320-e009133f : fcc_regs
e0091340-e009135f : fcc_regs
e0091380-e009139f : fcc_regs_c
e00913a0-e00913cf : fcc_regs_c
e00913d0-e00913ff : fcc_regs_c
e0091860-e00918bf : fsl-cpm-i2c.1
e0091a00-e0091a1f : fsl-cpm-scc.1
e0091a20-e0091a3f : fsl-cpm-scc.2
e0091a40-e0091a5f : fsl-cpm-scc.3
e0091a60-e0091a7f : fsl-cpm-scc.4
e0091aa0-e0091aff : fsl-cpm-spi.1
e0091b30-e0091b3f : fsl-cpm-mcc.1
e0091b50-e0091b5f : fsl-cpm-mcc.2
e00e1000-e00e1fff : fsl-perfmon.1
-bash-3.2# cat /proc/ioports
00000000-00ffffff : PCI1 host bridge
  00ff7f00-00ff7fff : 0000:00:1c.0



Thanks.

Best regards,
Stefan

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Kumar Gala]

On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:

> On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>> I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some
>>>> help testing.
>>>
>>> Yes, it would be greatly appreciated if you could start this
>>> TQM85xx port. I
>>> will of course do the testing.
>>
>> Ok, for the TQM85xx code in arch/ppc can I get a few things from you:
>>
>> 1. what processors does this actually support/run on.  I'm guessing
>> MPC8541, MPC8555?  But not really sure
>
> IIRC there are 4 different versions of the board:
> - 8540, 8541, 8555 & 8560

do they all boot/run with the code that exists in arch/ppc ?

thanks for the other info, that's exactly what I needed.

- k

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Kumar,

in message <D332B7CF-6633-494C-8031-807F7DF53D78@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
> 
> >> 1. what processors does this actually support/run on.  I'm guessing
> >> MPC8541, MPC8555?  But not really sure
> >
> > IIRC there are 4 different versions of the board:
> > - 8540, 8541, 8555 & 8560
> 
> do they all boot/run with the code that exists in arch/ppc ?

Yes, they do.

> thanks for the other info, that's exactly what I needed.

Just let us know what you need...

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do  not  under-
stand.

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Stefan Roese]

On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>>> I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some
> >>>> help testing.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, it would be greatly appreciated if you could start this
> >>> TQM85xx port. I
> >>> will of course do the testing.
> >>
> >> Ok, for the TQM85xx code in arch/ppc can I get a few things from you:
> >>
> >> 1. what processors does this actually support/run on.  I'm guessing
> >> MPC8541, MPC8555?  But not really sure
> >
> > IIRC there are 4 different versions of the board:
> > - 8540, 8541, 8555 & 8560
>
> do they all boot/run with the code that exists in arch/ppc ?

Yes. I have to admit though, that I'm not sure if the denx arch/ppc version 
differs from the kernel.org version.

Best regards,
Stefan

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 18:07 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in  
> arch/powerpc:
> 
> * STX GP3
> * TQM 85xx
> * SBC 8560
> 
> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David does.

Well, I found an sbc8560 in the boot of my car the other day and I
suppose it shouldn't take much -- so I might as well take a look, next
time I'm home.

-- 
dwmw2

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Kumar Gala]

On Oct 17, 2007, at 1:39 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:

>
> On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 18:07 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
>> arch/powerpc:
>>
>> * STX GP3
>> * TQM 85xx
>> * SBC 8560
>>
>> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David  
>> does.
>
> Well, I found an sbc8560 in the boot of my car the other day and I
> suppose it shouldn't take much -- so I might as well take a look, next
> time I'm home.

This really cracked me up.  I have to ask what the sbc8560 was doing  
in the boot of your car?

- k

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1335 bytes --]

On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2007, at 1:39 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 18:07 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
> >> arch/powerpc:
> >>
> >> * STX GP3
> >> * TQM 85xx
> >> * SBC 8560
> >>
> >> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David  
> >> does.
> >
> > Well, I found an sbc8560 in the boot of my car the other day and I
> > suppose it shouldn't take much -- so I might as well take a look, next
> > time I'm home.
> 
> This really cracked me up.  I have to ask what the sbc8560 was doing  
> in the boot of your car?

Perhaps it's there to distract the police from the other stuff in there? ;-)

With kind regards,
 
Geert Uytterhoeven
Software Architect

Sony Network and Software Technology Center Europe
The Corporate Village · Da Vincilaan 7-D1 · B-1935 Zaventem · Belgium
 
Phone:    +32 (0)2 700 8453	
Fax:      +32 (0)2 700 8622	
E-mail:   Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com	
Internet: http://www.sony-europe.com/
 	
Sony Network and Software Technology Center Europe	
A division of Sony Service Centre (Europe) N.V.	
Registered office: Technologielaan 7 · B-1840 Londerzeel · Belgium	
VAT BE 0413.825.160 · RPR Brussels	
Fortis Bank Zaventem · Swift GEBABEBB08A · IBAN BE39001382358619

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[Bruce Ashfield]

On 10/15/07, Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I was wondering if you cared about the following boards existing in
> arch/powerpc:
>
> * STX GP3
> * TQM 85xx
> * SBC 8560
>
> I'm told WR doesn't care about the SBC 8560, so I'll see if David does.

Sorry for the late reply, this just popped up on my radar this
morning when the 10th or 11th reply came in.

That doesn't reflect our intentions for that board, it is still active
and will continue to be that way for some time. Transition plans
are still in flux.

Bruce

>
> I'm willing to look into doing the port over, but would need some
> help testing.
>
> - k
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>


-- 
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end"

Re: boards in arch/ppc -> arch/powerpc for 85xx

[David Woodhouse]

On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 19:54 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> This really cracked me up.  I have to ask what the sbc8560 was doing  
> in the boot of your car?

The Land Rover was full.

-- 
dwmw2