linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: linas@austin.ibm.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mcarlson@broadcom.com,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mchan@broadcom.com,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [BUG] powerpc does not save msi state [was Re: [PATCH 5/7] pci: Export the pci_restore_msi_state() function
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:53:08 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071019.175308.54212640.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071020004610.GR29903@austin.ibm.com>

From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:46:10 -0500

> FWIW, it looks like not all that many arches do this; the output
> for grep -r address_hi * is pretty thin. Then, looking at
> i386/kernel/io_apic.c as an example, one can see that the 
> msi state save happens "by accident" if CONFIG_SMP is enabled;
> and so its surely broekn on uniprocesor machines.

I don't see this, in all cases write_msi_msg() will transfer
the given "*msg" to entry->msg by this assignment in
drivers/pci/msi.c:

void write_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
{
 ...
	entry->msg = *msg;
}

So as long as write_msi_msg() is invoked, it will be saved
properly.

Platforms need not do this explicitly.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-20  0:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20071019232926.GL29903@austin.ibm.com>
     [not found] ` <1192840577.5369.9.camel@dell>
     [not found]   ` <20071020000421.GO29903@austin.ibm.com>
     [not found]     ` <20071019.172706.57467960.davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-20  0:46       ` [BUG] powerpc does not save msi state [was Re: [PATCH 5/7] pci: Export the pci_restore_msi_state() function Linas Vepstas
2007-10-20  0:53         ` David Miller [this message]
2007-10-20  6:43           ` Michael Ellerman
2007-10-20 22:50             ` Michael Chan
2007-10-21 21:13             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-22 19:54           ` Linas Vepstas
2007-10-23  0:23             ` David Miller
2007-10-23  0:32               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-20  1:29         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071019.175308.54212640.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linas@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
    --cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).