From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mcarlson@broadcom.com,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mchan@broadcom.com,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [BUG] powerpc does not save msi state [was Re: [PATCH 5/7] pci: Export the pci_restore_msi_state() function
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:54:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071022195451.GE4280@austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071019.175308.54212640.davem@davemloft.net>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 05:53:08PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas)
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:46:10 -0500
>
> > FWIW, it looks like not all that many arches do this; the output
> > for grep -r address_hi * is pretty thin. Then, looking at
> > i386/kernel/io_apic.c as an example, one can see that the
> > msi state save happens "by accident" if CONFIG_SMP is enabled;
> > and so its surely broekn on uniprocesor machines.
>
> I don't see this, in all cases write_msi_msg() will transfer
> the given "*msg" to entry->msg by this assignment in
> drivers/pci/msi.c:
>
> void write_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
> {
> ...
> entry->msg = *msg;
> }
>
> So as long as write_msi_msg() is invoked, it will be saved
> properly.
As Michael Ellerman points out, the pseries msi setup is done
by firmware, and so this bit never happens.
As discussed in the other thread, I'll try to set up a patch
for an arch callback for restoring msi state.
-linas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-22 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071019232926.GL29903@austin.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1192840577.5369.9.camel@dell>
[not found] ` <20071020000421.GO29903@austin.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20071019.172706.57467960.davem@davemloft.net>
2007-10-20 0:46 ` [BUG] powerpc does not save msi state [was Re: [PATCH 5/7] pci: Export the pci_restore_msi_state() function Linas Vepstas
2007-10-20 0:53 ` David Miller
2007-10-20 6:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-10-20 22:50 ` Michael Chan
2007-10-21 21:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-22 19:54 ` Linas Vepstas [this message]
2007-10-23 0:23 ` David Miller
2007-10-23 0:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-20 1:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071022195451.GE4280@austin.ibm.com \
--to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mcarlson@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).