From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:18:02 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: Ocotea board? Message-ID: <20071023161802.531329f5@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1193171771.2085.1.camel@pasglop> References: <471E39E0.5070106@mock.com> <1193171771.2085.1.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeff Mock , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:36:11 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 11:13 -0700, Jeff Mock wrote: > > Is the Ocotea board (the original 440GX eval board) still interesting? > > I'm wrapping up a project using the 440GX, I started out hacking on the > > Ocotea board to get started, but we moved off Ocotea long ago onto our > > own hardware. > > > > I'm cleaning up the lab now that the project is nearly finished and I > > would like to give the board to someone that will put it to good use. > > I've sponged off this mailing list quite a lot, it's about time I give a > > little something back. > > Well, the ocotea has an interesting "feature" related to the way the > ethernet PHY an EMAC interact which I haven't dealt with in the new EMAC > driver at this stage. > > I -think- the Taishan I have may have the same issue though, in which > case I won't need it, but if not, I could have good use (or Josh in > Rochester) for one of these. Hardware is always welcome. I actually care about 4xx so if Ben doesn't want it then I'm sure I could find a good home... josh