From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Implement arch disable/enable irq hooks.
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:33:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071023163301.4857393e@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071023212404.GA30942@loki.buserror.net>
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:24:04 -0500
Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> wrote:
> These hooks ensure that a decrementer interrupt is not pending when
> suspending; otherwise, problems may occur. For example, with deep sleep
> on the 831x, a pending decrementer will cause a system freeze because the
> SoC thinks the decrementer interrupt would have woken the system, but the
> core must have interrupts disabled due to the setup required for deep
> sleep.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> ---
> Please queue these patches for 2.6.25 if they do not offend.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/asm-powerpc/machdep.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> index 9eb3284..5e2a39b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> @@ -647,6 +647,47 @@ void wakeup_decrementer(void)
> set_dec(ticks);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> +void generic_suspend_disable_irqs(void)
> +{
> + preempt_disable();
> +
> + /* Disable the decrementer, so that it doesn't interfere
> + * with suspending.
> + */
> +
> + set_dec(0x7fffffff);
> + hard_irq_disable();
> + set_dec(0x7fffffff);
> +}
> +
> +void generic_suspend_enable_irqs(void)
> +{
> + wakeup_decrementer();
> +
> + local_irq_enable();
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
Should these be static functions? Seems so...
> +
> +/* Overrides the weak version in kernel/power/main.c */
> +void arch_suspend_disable_irqs(void)
> +{
> + if (ppc_md.suspend_disable_irqs)
> + ppc_md.suspend_disable_irqs();
> + else
> + generic_suspend_disable_irqs();
> +}
> +
> +/* Overrides the weak version in kernel/power/main.c */
> +void arch_suspend_enable_irqs(void)
> +{
> + if (ppc_md.suspend_enable_irqs)
> + ppc_md.suspend_enable_irqs();
> + else
> + generic_suspend_enable_irqs();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> void __init smp_space_timers(unsigned int max_cpus)
> {
> diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/machdep.h b/include/asm-powerpc/machdep.h
> index 6968f43..15ba15a 100644
> --- a/include/asm-powerpc/machdep.h
> +++ b/include/asm-powerpc/machdep.h
> @@ -253,6 +253,16 @@ struct machdep_calls {
> */
> void (*machine_kexec)(struct kimage *image);
> #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> + /* These are called to disable and enable, respectively, IRQs when
> + * entering a suspend state. If NULL, then the generic versions
> + * will be called. The generic versions disable/enable the
> + * decrementer along with interrupts.
> + */
> + void (*suspend_disable_irqs)(void);
> + void (*suspend_enable_irqs)(void);
> +#endif
> };
>
> extern void power4_idle(void);
> @@ -326,5 +336,8 @@ static inline void log_error(char *buf, unsigned int err_type, int fatal)
> ppc_md.log_error(buf, err_type, fatal);
> }
>
> +void generic_suspend_disable_irqs(void);
> +void generic_suspend_enable_irqs(void);
And do they really need to be declared here?
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-23 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-23 21:24 [PATCH 1/7] Implement arch disable/enable irq hooks Scott Wood
2007-10-23 21:24 ` [PATCH 2/7] pm: Add TLF_SLEEPING hack to delay interrupt delivery when waking from sleep Scott Wood
2007-10-23 21:24 ` [PATCH 3/7] Add 6xx-style HID0_SLEEP support Scott Wood
2007-10-23 21:24 ` [PATCH 4/7] fsl_soc: Factor fsl_get_sys_freq() out of the wdt init Scott Wood
2007-10-23 21:25 ` [PATCH 5/7] mpc83xx: Power Management support Scott Wood
2007-10-23 21:25 ` [PATCH 6/7] mpc83xx: timer driver for PM wakeup Scott Wood
2007-10-27 10:46 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-10-23 21:25 ` [PATCH 7/7] gianfar: Add flags for magic packet and MDIO Scott Wood
2007-10-23 21:33 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2007-10-23 21:34 ` [PATCH 1/7] Implement arch disable/enable irq hooks Scott Wood
2007-10-23 22:45 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-25 18:01 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-25 12:57 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-04-28 20:33 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-29 4:44 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-04-29 5:04 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-04-30 10:33 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-04-30 22:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-04-30 17:22 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-30 21:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-04-30 21:07 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071023163301.4857393e@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com \
--to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).