From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:41:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071024224130.GA30819@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071024223250.GI19691@waste.org>
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:32:50PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Not completely implausible, but a) why isn't this seen on basically
> every machine with software TLB? b) why does -local- GDB, which is
> presumably doing much less work than gdbserver + network stack, not fail?
You said it yourself. Local gdb does more work -> blows through more
TLB entries.
I can't answer you about the other half, but I'm pretty sure TLB
invalidation is already supposed to be happening... somewhere.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-24 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-24 19:46 Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405 Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 20:28 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 20:42 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 20:46 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 21:54 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 22:27 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 22:32 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-24 22:39 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-24 22:40 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-26 1:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-24 22:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-10-26 1:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 20:41 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-27 1:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-27 1:27 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-24 20:34 ` David Daney
2007-10-26 1:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 1:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 2:45 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-26 3:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-26 14:41 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-27 1:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-27 7:32 ` [PATCH/RFC] powerpc: Pass PID argument to _tlbie (WAS: Apparent kernel bug with GDB on ppc405) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-29 12:08 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-29 20:15 ` Josh Boyer
2007-10-29 20:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-29 21:13 ` Matt Mackall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071024224130.GA30819@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).