From: "Dale Farnsworth" <dale@farnsworth.org>
To: domen.puncer@telargo.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] FEC - fast ethernet controller for mpc52xx
Date: 25 Oct 2007 11:57:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071025185706.29496.qmail@farnsworth.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071025141035.GG3369@nd47.coderock.org>
Domen wrote:
> > use your platform's dma mapping functions, rather than virt_to_phys()
> >
> > it might be the exact same implementation, inside the platform
> > internals, but drivers should not be using this directly.
>
> I've replaced this with dma_map_single(), unmatched with
> dma_unmap_single(), since bestcomm doesn't have a way to do that
> and it's blank on ppc32 anyway.
>
> Is this OK? PPC guys?
Even though dma_unmap_single() may be a no-op, calls to
dma_map_single() must be matched with calls to dma_unmap_single().
Perhaps with the additions below:
> +static void mpc52xx_fec_free_rx_buffers(struct bcom_task *s)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> + while (!bcom_queue_empty(s)) {
> + skb = bcom_retrieve_buffer(s, NULL, NULL);
dma_unmap_single(&skb->dev->dev, skb-data,
FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int mpc52xx_fec_alloc_rx_buffers(struct net_device *dev, struct
> bcom_task *rxtsk)
> +{
> + while (!bcom_queue_full(rxtsk)) {
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + struct bcom_fec_bd *bd;
> +
> + skb = dev_alloc_skb(FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE);
> + if (skb == NULL)
> + return -EAGAIN;
skb->dev = dev;
> +
> + /* zero out the initial receive buffers to aid debugging */
> + memset(skb->data, 0, FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE);
> +
> + bd = (struct bcom_fec_bd *)bcom_prepare_next_buffer(rxtsk);
> +
> + bd->status = FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE;
> + bd->skb_pa = dma_map_single(&dev->dev, skb->data,
> + FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +
> + bcom_submit_next_buffer(rxtsk, skb);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
[...]
> +static int mpc52xx_fec_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct mpc52xx_fec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct bcom_fec_bd *bd;
> +
> + if (bcom_queue_full(priv->tx_dmatsk)) {
> + if (net_ratelimit())
> + dev_err(&dev->dev, "transmit queue overrun\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&priv->lock);
> + dev->trans_start = jiffies;
> +
> + bd = (struct bcom_fec_bd *)
> + bcom_prepare_next_buffer(priv->tx_dmatsk);
> +
> + bd->status = skb->len | BCOM_FEC_TX_BD_TFD | BCOM_FEC_TX_BD_TC;
> + bd->skb_pa = dma_map_single(&dev->dev, skb->data, skb->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +
> + bcom_submit_next_buffer(priv->tx_dmatsk, skb);
> +
> + if (bcom_queue_full(priv->tx_dmatsk)) {
> + netif_stop_queue(dev);
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock_irq(&priv->lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* This handles BestComm transmit task interrupts
> + */
> +static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_fec_tx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
> + struct mpc52xx_fec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> + spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> +
> + while (bcom_buffer_done(priv->tx_dmatsk)) {
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + skb = bcom_retrieve_buffer(priv->tx_dmatsk, NULL, NULL);
> + /* Here (and in rx routines) would be a good place for
> + * dma_unmap_single(), but bcom doesn't return bcom_bd of the
> + * finished transfer, and _unmap is empty on this platfrom.
> + */
Replace the above comment with:
dma_unmap_single(&dev->dev, skb->data,
skb->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +
> + dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
> + }
> +
> + netif_wake_queue(dev);
> +
> + spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_fec_rx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
> + struct mpc52xx_fec_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> + while (bcom_buffer_done(priv->rx_dmatsk)) {
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + struct sk_buff *rskb;
> + struct bcom_fec_bd *bd;
> + u32 status;
> +
> + rskb = bcom_retrieve_buffer(priv->rx_dmatsk, &status, NULL);
dma_unmap_single(&dev->dev, rskb->data,
FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +
> + /* Test for errors in received frame */
> + if (status & BCOM_FEC_RX_BD_ERRORS) {
> + /* Drop packet and reuse the buffer */
> + bd = (struct bcom_fec_bd *)
> + bcom_prepare_next_buffer(priv->rx_dmatsk);
> +
> + bd->status = FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE;
> + bd->skb_pa = dma_map_single(&dev->dev, rskb->data,
> + FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +
> + bcom_submit_next_buffer(priv->rx_dmatsk, rskb);
> +
> + dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> +
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* skbs are allocated on open, so now we allocate a new one,
> + * and remove the old (with the packet) */
> + skb = dev_alloc_skb(FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE);
> + if (skb) {
> + /* Process the received skb */
> + int length = status & BCOM_FEC_RX_BD_LEN_MASK;
skb->dev = dev;
> +
> + skb_put(rskb, length - 4); /* length without CRC32 */
> +
> + rskb->dev = dev;
Above line is no longer needed since we set rskb->dev on skb allocation.
> + rskb->protocol = eth_type_trans(rskb, dev);
> +
> + netif_rx(rskb);
> + dev->last_rx = jiffies;
> + } else {
> + /* Can't get a new one : reuse the same & drop pkt */
> + dev_notice(&dev->dev, "Memory squeeze, dropping packet.\n");
> + dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> +
> + skb = rskb;
> + }
> +
> + bd = (struct bcom_fec_bd *)
> + bcom_prepare_next_buffer(priv->rx_dmatsk);
> +
> + bd->status = FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE;
> + bd->skb_pa = dma_map_single(&dev->dev, rskb->data,
> + FEC_RX_BUFFER_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +
> + bcom_submit_next_buffer(priv->rx_dmatsk, skb);
> + }
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
-Dale Farnsworth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-14 7:55 [PATCH v3 0/4] FEC - fast ethernet controller for mpc52xx Domen Puncer
2007-10-14 7:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] FEC mpc52xx: device tree changes Domen Puncer
2007-10-14 7:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] FEC mpc52xx: add some bestcomm flags Domen Puncer
2007-10-14 7:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] FEC mpc52xx: the driver Domen Puncer
2007-10-14 21:43 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-14 7:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] FEC mpc52xx: phy part of " Domen Puncer
2007-10-14 22:05 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-15 10:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] FEC mpc52xx: phy part of the driver\ Domen Puncer
2007-10-15 14:30 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-15 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] FEC - fast ethernet controller for mpc52xx Jeff Garzik
2007-10-15 19:19 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-18 14:15 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-18 19:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 11:27 ` [PATCH v4] " Domen Puncer
2007-10-21 18:32 ` Grant Likely
2007-10-25 9:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-25 14:10 ` Domen Puncer
2007-10-25 18:57 ` Dale Farnsworth [this message]
2007-10-25 19:41 ` Domen Puncer
2007-10-25 20:29 ` Dale Farnsworth
2007-10-25 22:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-25 23:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-26 11:59 ` [PATCH v4.2] " Domen Puncer
2007-10-26 14:18 ` Dale Farnsworth
2007-10-26 16:07 ` [PATCH v4.3] " Domen Puncer
2007-10-29 9:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-29 15:37 ` Grant Likely
2007-11-01 11:31 ` [PATCH v4] " tnt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071025185706.29496.qmail@farnsworth.org \
--to=dale@farnsworth.org \
--cc=domen.puncer@telargo.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).