linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Tjernlund" <tjernlund@tjernlund.se>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [i2c] i2c-mpc.c driver issues
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:53:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071026115329.0307e207@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <019001c81681$b5d449c0$5267a8c0@Jocke>

Hi Jocke,

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:06:13 +0200, Tjernlund wrote:
> While browsing the i2c-mpc.c driver I noticed some things that look odd
> to me so I figured I report them. Could not find a maintainer in the MAINTANERS file
> so I sent here, cc:ed linuxppc-dev as well.
> 
> 1) There are a lot of return -1 error code that is propagated back to
>    userspace. Should be changed to proper -Exxx codes.

This is true of many Linux i2c bus drivers, unfortunately. While nothing
actually prevents drivers from returning -1 to userspace on error,
meaningful error codes would of course be preferred.

> 2) mpc_read(), according to the comment below it sends a STOP condition here but
>    this function does not known if this is the last read or not. mpc_xfer is
>    the one that knows when the transaction is over and should send the stop, which it already
>    does.
> 
>  /* Generate stop on last byte */
>   if (i == length - 1)
>        writeccr(i2c, CCR_MIEN | CCR_MEN | CCR_TXAK);

Probably correct, although I am not familiar with this specific
hardware. I guess that the same is true of mpc_write as well, which is
even worse because write + read combined transactions are very common
(while read + write are not.)

I'm not completely sure that mpc_xfer sends the stop. mpc_i2c_stop
doesn't seem to do much.

Now that you've identified these bugs, what about sending patches
to fix them?

-- 
Jean Delvare

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-26  9:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-24 21:06 i2c-mpc.c driver issues Tjernlund
2007-10-24 22:44 ` Jon Smirl
2007-10-26  9:53 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2007-10-26 11:21   ` [i2c] " Joakim Tjernlund
2007-10-27 20:52   ` Joakim Tjernlund

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071026115329.0307e207@hyperion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=tjernlund@tjernlund.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).