From: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@mail.ru>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
leoli@freescale.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucc_geth: add support for netpoll
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:37:31 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071027143731.GA2616@zarina> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4723389F.7010109@ru.mvista.com>
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 05:09:51PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> > This patch adds netpoll support for the QE UCC Gigabit Ethernet
> > driver. The approach is very similar to the gianfar driver.
>
> It's rather contrarywise -- this is standard approach and gianfar with its
> 3 TSEC IRQs has a quite non-standard poll_controller() implementation.
Oh.. well, right -- gianfar a bit more comlex in that regard.
>
> > Tested using netconsole.
>
> KGDBoE is considered a better test (I hope you've also tested with it).
At the time of posting it was tested using netconsole only, a few
days later it's was tested using KGDBoE also. So, it works indeed.
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
> > index 18a6f48..06807ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ucc_geth.c
> > @@ -3691,6 +3691,22 @@ static irqreturn_t ucc_geth_irq_handler(int irq, void *info)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
> > +/*
> > + * Polling 'interrupt' - used by things like netconsole to send skbs
> > + * without having to re-enable interrupts. It's not called while
> > + * the interrupt routine is executing.
> > + */
> > +static void ucc_netpoll(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct ucc_geth_private *ugeth = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +
> > + disable_irq(ugeth->ug_info->uf_info.irq);
> > + ucc_geth_irq_handler(ugeth->ug_info->uf_info.irq, dev);
> > + enable_irq(ugeth->ug_info->uf_info.irq);
>
> Why not make it less complex (for a reader and gcc too :-) ?
Yup, I'm agree here but it's too late. Again. ;-)
This patch already accepted into the -mm (a week or so after the
silence), so.. now I'd rather not bother Andrew with such really
cosmetic changes. But if Jeff would directly apply modfied patch,
I'll send it. ;-)
Anyhow, I'm sincerely appreciate your comments.
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@mail.ru
backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-27 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-11 12:48 [PATCH] ucc_geth: add support for netpoll Anton Vorontsov
2007-10-27 13:09 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-10-27 14:37 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2007-10-29 6:12 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-10-29 12:17 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-10-31 21:59 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-11-01 2:33 ` Li Yang-r58472
2007-11-01 10:05 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071027143731.GA2616@zarina \
--to=cbou@mail.ru \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).