From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (e35.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e35.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B527DDD0D for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 00:02:16 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9VD28nc032332 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:02:08 -0400 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l9VD28uu094020 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:02:08 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l9VD28uO019453 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:02:08 -0600 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:59:19 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: Valentine Barshak Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PowerPC: 440GRx Rainier board support. Message-ID: <20071031075919.16a4ed14@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <47287339.6040404@ru.mvista.com> References: <20071030164511.GA21973@ru.mvista.com> <20071030151608.28a2d706@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com> <47287339.6040404@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:21:13 +0300 Valentine Barshak wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:45:11 +0300 > > Valentine Barshak wrote: > > > >> The following patches add PowerPC 440GRx Rainier board support. > >> The board is almost identical to Sequoia, but doesn't have USB > >> and FPU is not supported. > > > > So why do we need anything other than the DTS and the defconfig? I > > would think the sequoia wrapper and platform files would suffice > > completely for this. > > Yes, they would, but how to handle the board name in this case? > I mean the resulting image would be cuImage.sequoia for rainier and the > DTS board name has to be sequoia for rainier too. > I don't now, may be it's not a big deal to call rainier a sequoia though. > What do you think? Let me think about this for a bit. Theoretically, there should be a way to have a common code base between these two boards and have the images use the right names. josh