From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kellthuzad.dmz.nerim.net (smtp-dmz-232-tuesday.dmz.nerim.net [195.5.254.232]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0DADDDFE for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 04:32:14 +1100 (EST) Received: from kraid.nerim.net (smtp-102-tuesday.nerim.net [62.4.16.102]) by kellthuzad.dmz.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B43B26912 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:32:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 18:32:10 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: Matt Sealey Subject: Re: [RFC] Rework of i2c-mpc.c - Freescale i2c driver Message-ID: <20071106183210.50058019@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <472F9086.2060606@genesi-usa.com> References: <9e4733910711050714l2aa3a5eeqf5327c3e0d8ca490@mail.gmail.com> <472F7247.9070106@freescale.com> <9e4733910711051230w2d90a710idec3dcfc2e0f5c16@mail.gmail.com> <472F8267.8070106@freescale.com> <472F9086.2060606@genesi-usa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Tjernlund , i2c@lm-sensors.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:52:06 +0000, Matt Sealey wrote: > Well, all i2c devices have a chip id you can probe for (...) This statement is completely incorrect. I2C devices do NOT have standard ID registers. Some devices have proprietary ID registers, some don't, it's really up to the manfacturer. -- Jean Delvare