From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sceptre.pobox.com (sceptre.pobox.com [207.106.133.20]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C24DDDD8 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 12:19:59 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 19:19:43 -0600 From: Nathan Lynch To: Medve Emilian Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] reduce load time for modules with lots of relocs Message-ID: <20071107011943.GM9695@localdomain> References: <598D5675D34BE349929AF5EDE9B03E270174CC98@az33exm24.fsl.freescale.net> <20071101235728.GE9695@localdomain> <20071106023355.GJ9695@localdomain> <598D5675D34BE349929AF5EDE9B03E270174D37B@az33exm24.fsl.freescale.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <598D5675D34BE349929AF5EDE9B03E270174D37B@az33exm24.fsl.freescale.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Medve Emilian wrote: > Would it be possible to do the sort "in place" (without the extra > buffer)? I mean would that upset any other part of the kernel? I suspect so. Sounds like you've got the good testcase, maybe you should try it and see. :)