From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
paulus@samba.org, Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>,
jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fixups for mpc8360 rev. 2.1 erratum #2 (RGMII Timing)
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:39:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071108183952.GA18117@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071108121508.39a65c33.kim.phillips@freescale.com>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:15:08PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:16:11 +0300
> Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 12:15:30PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360,
> > > according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below). Basically the
> > > most intrusive part is the addition of two new RGMII Internal Delay
> > > modes; one for TX delay only, and the other for RX delay only (i.e, not
> > > both at the same time).
> > >
> > > Please review, and since this affects both netdev and powerpc trees,
> > > one maintainer should ack them for the other to push upstream (i.e,
> > > Kumar acks them, and Leo picks them up to go through netdev or the
> > > other way around; either way is fine with me). I'm hoping they're
> > > trivial enough to go in 2.6.24.
> > >
> > > Depending on how the review goes, a follow-on patch to u-boot will be
> > > sent out that fixes up the phy-connection-type in the device tree (from
> > > "rgmii-id" to "rgmii-rxid" iff on mpc8360rev2.1).
> >
> > I've upgraded CPU to rev2.1, board rev0.3.
> >
> thanks for testing this. I tested these patches on a "pilot assy 0.3".
Same here.
> > Applied 5/5 patches onto paulus/powerpc.git at e403149c92a. Here is
> > the results:
> >
> > If I use -rxid, then geth not able to transmit anything.
> > With -txid geth not able to receive anything.
> >
> > With just -id everything works fine though...
> >
> >
> > Maybe there should be another condition, in addition to cpu rev2.1?
> >
> the errata simply states 'pilot boards', but we can probably modify
> u-boot to look at the cpu rev and the board rev (BCSR 12).
>
> My bcsr12 looks like:
>
> => md.b f800000c 1
> f800000c: 10 .
>
> what is yours?
=> md.b f800000c 1
f800000c: 10 .
:-/
U-Boot 1.3.0-rc3-g281df457-dirty (Nov 6 2007 - 18:19:35) MPC83XX
CPU: e300c1, MPC8360E, Rev: 21 at 528 MHz, CSB: 264 MHz
root@b1:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : e300c1
clock : 528.000000MHz
revision : 3.1 (pvr 8083 0031)
bogomips : 131.58
timebase : 66000000
platform : MPC836x MDS
+ /* handle mpc8360ea rev.2.1 erratum 2: RGMII Timing */
+ svid = mfspr(SPRN_SVR);
+ if (svid == 0x80480021) {
^^ that branch executes on the board I'm testing.
> If it's something like 0x03, the u-boot patch will probably look like:
>
> if ((bcsr[12] == 0x10) &&
> (immr->sysconf.spridr == SPR_8360_REV21 ||
> immr->sysconf.spridr == SPR_8360E_REV21))
> /* if phy-connection-type is "rgmii-id", set it to "rgmii-rxid" */
> ...
>
> but these linux patches would remain the same (the clk and data delay
> settings for the UCC's are still valid; it's just the PHY config
> that is triggering your problem from what I can tell).
Yup, most likely this is not UCC specific, but PHY. For some reason
delays making harm here...
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@mail.ru
backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-08 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-05 18:15 [PATCH 0/5] fixups for mpc8360 rev. 2.1 erratum #2 (RGMII Timing) Kim Phillips
2007-11-08 14:16 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-11-08 18:15 ` Kim Phillips
2007-11-08 18:39 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2007-11-08 19:11 ` Kim Phillips
2007-11-09 13:25 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-11-09 20:16 ` Kim Phillips
2007-11-09 13:33 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-11-19 23:36 ` Kim Phillips
2007-11-20 1:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-20 15:27 ` Kumar Gala
2007-11-20 11:08 ` Li Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071108183952.GA18117@localhost.localdomain \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@freescale.com \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).