From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.228]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6CEDDDD5 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 04:07:33 +1100 (EST) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so142370wri for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:07:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:06:58 -0600 From: Josh Boyer To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [POWERPC] [RFC] Fix 8xx tlbie definition Message-ID: <20071117110658.7375dc1a@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <1195261547.28865.184.camel@pasglop> References: <20071116112822.37a238c0@weaponx> <1195247189.28865.174.camel@pasglop> <20071117012837.4811d394@kernel.crashing.org> <1195261547.28865.184.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:05:47 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 01:28 +0300, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:06:29 +1100 > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 11:28 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > Git commit e701d269aa28996f3502780951fe1b12d5d66b49 introduced an > > > > incorrect definition for _tlbie on PowerPC 8xx platforms. Only the > > > > address should be passed to the function. This patch corrects the > > > > definition of _tlbie and the related tlb flushing functions for 8xx. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer > > > > > > That conflicts with the patch I posted to fix it differently (I kept > > > the additional argument). > > > > > > > Where can I grab it to give a try? My linuxppc archive is silent for some reason.. > > Looks like I may have failed to post it ... weird, I was sure I posted > that days ago, when Olof first mentioned the breakage. I'll check & > resend. I never saw it. If I had, I wouldn't have bothered to post my own version :) > > > Which one do we take ? > > > > > > > If your solution will work out, I'd agree with Kumar to have this thing consistent. > > If not - It might be cheapier just to fix it this gross way, to keep 8xx stuff running. Consistency is fine with me. I was going for quick and dirty to make sure it wasn't broken in .24. josh