From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw01.freescale.net (az33egw01.freescale.net [192.88.158.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw01.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C09DDDDFD for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:37:29 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:36:52 -0600 From: Kim Phillips To: Li Yang , Kumar Gala , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, jgarzik@pobox.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fixups for mpc8360 rev. 2.1 erratum #2 (RGMII Timing) Message-Id: <20071119173652.55e385b2.kim.phillips@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <20071105121530.5c38fbb7.kim.phillips@freescale.com> References: <20071105121530.5c38fbb7.kim.phillips@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:15:30 -0600 Kim Phillips wrote: > Hello all, > > the following patches fix RGMII timing for rev. 2.1 of the mpc8360, > according to erratum #2 (erratum text included below). Basically the > most intrusive part is the addition of two new RGMII Internal Delay > modes; one for TX delay only, and the other for RX delay only (i.e, not > both at the same time). > > Please review, and since this affects both netdev and powerpc trees, > one maintainer should ack them for the other to push upstream (i.e, > Kumar acks them, and Leo picks them up to go through netdev or the > other way around; either way is fine with me). I'm hoping they're > trivial enough to go in 2.6.24. > Kumar, Leo, re-ping due to (a) it's been 2 weeks and (b) Anton Vorontsov has since issued his Tested-by. Might I suggest Kumar ack the powerpc patches, and Leo/Jeff apply 5/5 to go through netdev? Kim