From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A6CDDDFC for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:49:26 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:49:08 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: annoying prinkts during vmemmap initialization Message-ID: <20071121224908.GA14893@lst.de> References: <20071121153526.GA23589@lst.de> <20071122094145.e79e1084.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20071122094145.e79e1084.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Christoph Hellwig List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 09:41:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Any reason to keep this? And if yes can we please make it conditional > > on some kind of vmemmap_debug boot option? > > These have been changed to pr_debug() in 2.6.24-rc3 kernel. Ah, sorry for not checking. Looks like the spufs tree lags a little behind.