From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx33.mail.ru (mx33.mail.ru [194.67.23.194]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999F4DDE27 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 11:28:05 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:21:26 +0300 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] OF-platform PATA driver Message-ID: <20071126002126.GA20043@zarina> References: <20071123175229.GA27143@localhost.localdomain> <200711242150.09812.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 In-Reply-To: <200711242150.09812.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Paul Mundt , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: cbou@mail.ru List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:50:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 23 November 2007, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > Here is the PATA Platform driver using OF infrastructure. > > > > Mostly it's just a wrapper around a bit modified pata_platform > > driver. > > Thanks a lot for doing this. Patches 2/3 are what I tried to get > people to do for some time now but was too lazy to do myself. > > As a further thought, do the drivers now still need to be > pata specific, or should the OF part be called ata_of_platform > instead and also be used for sata devices? Ugh, I don't know much about sata, it should act just as a pata in the very basic usage, IIRC. So it's worth trying, but I don't have any platform satas to try... :-/ Hereby, I'd rather stick with pata name, as it's never too late to simply rename things later. Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbou@mail.ru backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2