From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2042EDDE45 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:31:37 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:34:45 -0600 From: Olof Johansson To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 5/14] powerpc: Fix 440/440A machine check handling Message-ID: <20071128213445.GA29962@lixom.net> References: <1195625777.579001.269266058699.qpush@grosgo> <20071121061714.0AB82DEAF1@ozlabs.org> <20071121071240.141d2917@weaponx> <1195674530.6970.86.camel@pasglop> <20071121135109.73b9e98f@weaponx> <1195675525.6970.100.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1195675525.6970.100.camel@pasglop> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 07:05:25AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 13:51 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > Hrm... it's per processor, not per board. I didn't feel like digging > > > which board uses which processor and go fixup all the ppc_md's > > > > Sounds like something a generic function could probe for from the DTS. > > I'll look at doing something here when I start making 44x > > multiplatform > > (soon). > > Well... we already probe the CPU type.... from cputable. > > So if there was a place to put that, it would be the cputable. It could make sense to have _both_ platform (ppc_md) and cputable functions, since some info is likely to be core-specific, other might be board/chipset/SoC-specific. -Olof