From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BAADDEAB for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 00:00:40 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:00:22 +0300 From: Vitaly Bordug To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com Subject: Re: CPM2 USB host driver Message-ID: <20071130160022.5701fc03@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <20071130124801.GA13141@localhost.localdomain> References: <200711301145.52926.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <20071130141638.4e00258d@kernel.crashing.org> <200711301330.25100.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <20071130124801.GA13141@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mike@compulab.co.il List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:48:01 +0300 Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 01:30:18PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Friday 30 November 2007 12:16, Vitaly Bordug wrote: > > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:45:49 +0100 > > > > > > Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > Linux USB host support for the CPM, CPM2 and CPM2 pro is far > > > > from complete. Many people showed interest on this list (and on > > > > linuxppc-embedded) in the past, but nobody managed to complete a > > > > driver and get it merged. > > > > > > that is mainly because of its semi-software nature. However, any > > > approach would be helpful I beleive. > >=20 > > The CPM/CPM2 USB host controller does indeed put some pressure on > > the CPU. The PowerQuick III family is much better in that respect > > as its USB host controller is EHCI compliant. >=20 > I didn't yet compare with CPM/CPM2, but I wonder if PQIIPro (MPC8360E) > USB controller is similar to cpms?.. > =46rom what I recall, it is similar, but ucc usb should work fine, at least according to RM it does all the necessary things in hw so the cpu isn't hogged with say SOF generation. > I tried to forward-port FHCI from Freescale 2.6.11 kernels. Twice. > But these efforts always stumbled over more important tasks. >=20 --=20 Sincerely, Vitaly