From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:40:25 +1100 From: David Gibson To: Stephen Neuendorffer Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree 'ranges'. Message-ID: <20071204024025.GG32577@localhost.localdomain> References: <20071204010818.AD4231798062@mail212-sin.bigfish.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20071204010818.AD4231798062@mail212-sin.bigfish.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:08:57PM -0800, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote: > I was misled by the prior language. I've attempted to clarify how > 'ranges' are used, in particular, how to get an identity mapping. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer Acked-by: David Gibson Thanks for the update. I particularly dislike the "1:1" terminology, because in maths-speak *any* ranges translation is 1:1, unless it includes overlapping ranges. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson