* [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree 'ranges'.
@ 2007-12-04 1:08 Stephen Neuendorffer
2007-12-04 2:40 ` David Gibson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Neuendorffer @ 2007-12-04 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grant.likely, david, linuxppc-dev
I was misled by the prior language. I've attempted to clarify how
'ranges' are used, in particular, how to get an identity mapping.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
---
Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt | 13 +++++++++----
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt b/Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt
index e9a3cb1..7327f37 100644
--- a/Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt
+++ b/Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt
@@ -711,13 +711,14 @@ define a bus type with a more complex address format, including things
like address space bits, you'll have to add a bus translator to the
prom_parse.c file of the recent kernels for your bus type.
-The "reg" property only defines addresses and sizes (if #size-cells
-is non-0) within a given bus. In order to translate addresses upward
+The "reg" property only defines addresses and sizes (if #size-cells is
+non-0) within a given bus. In order to translate addresses upward
(that is into parent bus addresses, and possibly into CPU physical
addresses), all busses must contain a "ranges" property. If the
"ranges" property is missing at a given level, it's assumed that
-translation isn't possible. The format of the "ranges" property for a
-bus is a list of:
+translation isn't possible, i.e., the registers are not visible on the
+parent bus. The format of the "ranges" property for a bus is a list
+of:
bus address, parent bus address, size
@@ -735,6 +736,10 @@ fit in a single 32-bit word. New 32-bit powerpc boards should use a
1/1 format, unless the processor supports physical addresses greater
than 32-bits, in which case a 2/1 format is recommended.
+Alternatively, the "ranges" property may be empty, indicating that the
+registers are visible on the parent bus using an identity mapping
+translation. In other words, the parent bus address space is the same
+as the child bus address space.
2) Note about "compatible" properties
-------------------------------------
--
1.5.3.4-dirty
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree 'ranges'.
2007-12-04 1:08 [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree 'ranges' Stephen Neuendorffer
@ 2007-12-04 2:40 ` David Gibson
2007-12-04 3:22 ` Grant Likely
2007-12-04 5:27 ` [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree'ranges' Stephen Neuendorffer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Gibson @ 2007-12-04 2:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Neuendorffer; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:08:57PM -0800, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> I was misled by the prior language. I've attempted to clarify how
> 'ranges' are used, in particular, how to get an identity mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Thanks for the update. I particularly dislike the "1:1" terminology,
because in maths-speak *any* ranges translation is 1:1, unless it
includes overlapping ranges.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree 'ranges'.
2007-12-04 2:40 ` David Gibson
@ 2007-12-04 3:22 ` Grant Likely
2007-12-04 5:27 ` [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree'ranges' Stephen Neuendorffer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2007-12-04 3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Neuendorffer, grant.likely, linuxppc-dev
On 12/3/07, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:08:57PM -0800, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> > I was misled by the prior language. I've attempted to clarify how
> > 'ranges' are used, in particular, how to get an identity mapping.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
>
> Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>
> Thanks for the update. I particularly dislike the "1:1" terminology,
> because in maths-speak *any* ranges translation is 1:1, unless it
> includes overlapping ranges.
>
> --
> David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
> david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
> | _way_ _around_!
> http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely@secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree'ranges'.
2007-12-04 2:40 ` David Gibson
2007-12-04 3:22 ` Grant Likely
@ 2007-12-04 5:27 ` Stephen Neuendorffer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Neuendorffer @ 2007-12-04 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Gibson; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1077 bytes --]
I'm actually a little embarrassed that I didn't pick that nit myself.. :)
-----Original Message-----
From: David Gibson [mailto:david@gibson.dropbear.id.au]
Sent: Mon 12/3/2007 6:40 PM
To: Stephen Neuendorffer
Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree'ranges'.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 05:08:57PM -0800, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> I was misled by the prior language. I've attempted to clarify how
> 'ranges' are used, in particular, how to get an identity mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Thanks for the update. I particularly dislike the "1:1" terminology,
because in maths-speak *any* ranges translation is 1:1, unless it
includes overlapping ranges.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2029 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-04 5:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-04 1:08 [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree 'ranges' Stephen Neuendorffer
2007-12-04 2:40 ` David Gibson
2007-12-04 3:22 ` Grant Likely
2007-12-04 5:27 ` [PATCH] [POWERPC] [v2] Improved documentation of device tree'ranges' Stephen Neuendorffer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).