From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com (e3.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e3.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC6BDDDFC for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:28:58 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lB4FSr1E026969 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:28:53 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id lB4FSrJC095578 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:28:53 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lB4FSrsx000717 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:28:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 09:26:11 -0600 From: Josh Boyer To: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: Merge dtc Message-ID: <20071204092611.79e08953@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20071016050217.GA9052@localhost.localdomain> <1196733544.13978.201.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul, David Woodhouse , Mackerras , David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:25:57 -0600 Jon Loeliger wrote: > So, like, the other day David Woodhouse mumbled: > > > > I think this is a bad idea -- it's hardly a difficult for those people > > who _do_ need dts to obtain it separately. > > > > We shouldn't be merging _more_ stuff in. > > Thanks for chiming in here, David W. As far as I can tell > so far, the only two people who have voiced an opinion on > this issue are Dave G, submitting patches, and me disagreeing > with the approach. :-) > > Anyone else? I don't see an overwhelmingly great reason to merge it. It might help test people who do automated rebuilds, etc and aren't used to dealing with powerpc and it's requirements. Outside of that, I see it as dual-maintenance. But I'm not doing the maintenance, and it doesn't effect me too much. I only ask that a decision is made and executed on soon so we can move on. josh