From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com (e2.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e2.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203F8DE0D3 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:02:45 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lB542gqI023531 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 23:02:42 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id lB542gGK138820 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 23:02:42 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lB542fUm026797 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 23:02:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 22:00:12 -0600 From: Josh Boyer To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: Merge dtc Message-ID: <20071204220012.1b91c27c@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20071204202625.05367103@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <20071016050217.GA9052@localhost.localdomain> <1196733544.13978.201.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <18261.53985.700234.923526@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20071204163409.6d03c7a5@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <18262.2934.447856.686438@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20071204202625.05367103@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, David Woodhouse , David Gibson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 20:26:25 -0600 Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:22:46 +1100 > Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > Josh Boyer writes: > > > > > Using that same reasoning, should we merge a mkimage patch for the > > > boards that use U-Boot? > > > > I think so. It's fairly small and it would mean that people could > > cross-compile all the defconfigs easily. > > I'll try to work up a patch tonight. OK so it won't be tonight. The problem we have with mkimage, unlike DTC at the moment, is that it _is_ used on other architectures. There's already a mkuboot.sh script, which calls mkimage, in scripts/ right now. Adding mkimage to arch/powerpc only seems pretty wrong. So if mkimage is going to be put in-kernel, I'd rather it be in a more generic place. Arguably, dtc should go there as well seeing as how microblaze could probably use it too. josh