From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: dtc: RFC: Fix some lexical problems with references
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 16:34:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071205163409.77fba42b@zod.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071122061007.GA22888@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:10:07 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> The recent change to the lexer to only recognize property and node
> names in the appropriate context removed a number of lexical warts in
> our language that would have gotten ugly as we add expression support
> and so forth.
>
> But there's one nasty one remaining: references can contain a full
> path, including the various problematic node name characters (',', '+'
> and '-', for example). This would cause trouble with expressions, and
> it also causes trouble with the patch I'm working on to allow
> expanding references to paths rather than phandles. This patch
> therefore reworks the lexer to mitigate these problems.
>
> - References to labels cause no problems. These are now
> recognized separately from references to full paths. No syntax change
> here.
>
> - References to full paths, including problematic characters
> are allowed by "quoting" the path with braces
> e.g. &{/pci@10000/somedevice@3,8000}. The braces protect any internal
> problematic characters from being confused with operators or whatever.
>
> - For compatibility with existing dts files, in v0 dts files
> we allow bare references to paths as before &/foo/bar/whatever - but
> *only* if the path contains no troublesome characters. Specifically
> only [a-zA-Z0-9_@/] are allowed.
>
> This is an incompatible change to the dts-v1 format, but since AFAIK
> no-one has yet switched to dts-v1 files, I think we can get away with
> it. Better to make the transition when people to convert to v1, and
> get rid of the problematic old syntax.
>
> Strictly speaking, it's also an incompatible change to the v0 format,
> since some path references that were allowed before are no longer
> allowed. I suspect no-one has been using the no-longer-supported
> forms (certainly none of the kernel dts files will cause trouble). We
> might need to think about this harder, though.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
So this breaks some of the in-kernel DTS files. Example, bamboo.dts on
line 19 produces:
bamboo.dts: 19 syntax error
FATAL ERROR: Couldn't read input tree
I tried quoting the path with {} but that didn't seem to work.
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-05 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-22 6:10 dtc: RFC: Fix some lexical problems with references David Gibson
2007-11-22 6:23 ` David Gibson
2007-11-26 22:38 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-11-28 19:53 ` Jon Loeliger
2007-12-05 22:34 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2007-12-05 22:44 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071205163409.77fba42b@zod.rchland.ibm.com \
--to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).