From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com (e3.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e3.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271F0DDDE7 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:44:08 +1100 (EST) Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lB9Ei39t023933 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 09:44:03 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id lB9Ei2r5113942 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 09:44:02 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lB9Ei2lo020449 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 09:44:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 08:40:33 -0600 From: Josh Boyer To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: Powerpc PCI cleanups (mainly iSeries) Message-ID: <20071209084033.2a3ae963@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1197185366.6572.43.camel@pasglop> References: <20071206180045.0eb1db98.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20071207020726.8c0ea12b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20071206094448.4de7967a@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1197185366.6572.43.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Stephen Rothwell , ppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:29:26 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 09:44 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 02:07:26 +1100 > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 18:00:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > I started out looking for ways to remove our dependencies on pci_dn and > > > > got sidetracked into clening up the iSeries PCI code. The intention of > > > > the following set of patches is that there be no semantic changes > > > > (mostly). > > > > > > Some of these will clearly conflict with Benh's PCI work. We will sot > > > that out between us. :-) > > > > In the meantime... > > > > My tree is going to carry BenH's patches since they're obviously > > important to 4xx. If these conflicts get sorted out soon, that would > > be good :). At some point I'm going to start sending stuff to Paul. > > The PCI merge serie of my patches shoudn't go through your tree (it's a > separate serie from my 4xx stuff and isn't quite ready just yet...). I wasn't talking about your series of 10 patches. You'll have conflicts in your series of 25 too, though those should be fairly minor. josh