From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426A7DDEDE for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:34:16 +1100 (EST) Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 14:39:03 -0600 From: Olof Johansson To: Jon Smirl Subject: Re: [i2c] [PATCH 0/4] Series to add device tree naming to i2c Message-ID: <20071209203903.GB26651@lixom.net> References: <20071203212032.23543.3453.stgit@terra.home> <9e4733910712091224mcb43f0ci69f578d221505ba7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <9e4733910712091224mcb43f0ci69f578d221505ba7@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Jean Delvare , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:24:55PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: > What is the status of this series, is there anything I can do to help > get this into the i2c subsystem? I never saw the comments about whitespace cleanups being addressed. If you run them through checkpatch you'll see quite a few things that needs fixups. Care to do the round of cleanups and repost the series? Besides that I'm fine with the approach of moving the matching to the i2c layer, it does seem like a reasonable thing to do. -Olof