From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Use embedded libfdt in the bootwrapper
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:10:56 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071210231056.GC5495@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071210173217.GB4497@loki.buserror.net>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:32:17AM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 02:28:39PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > +#define check_err(err) \
> > + ({ \
> > + if (BAD_ERROR(err) || ((err < 0) && DEBUG)) \
> > + printf("%s():%d %s\n\r", __FUNCTION__, __LINE__, \
> > + fdt_strerror(err)); \
> > + if (BAD_ERROR(err)) \
> > + exit(); \
> > + (err < 0) ? -1 : 0; \
> > + })
> > +
> > +#define offset_devp(off) \
> > + ({ \
> > + int offset = (off); \
> > + check_err(offset) ? NULL : (void *)(offset+1); \
> > + })
> > +
> > +#define devp_offset(devp) (((int)(devp))-1)
>
> How does using offsets as devps work if a devp was previously acquired to a
> node that has to be moved due to a change later made in an earlier part of
> the tree?
It doesn't; don't do that. I just don't think truly persistent
phandles are worth the code complexity to implement them. Especially
since their use more-or-less completely precludes libfdt's "stateless"
approach, which has significant other advantages.
To reduce the confusion over this, the libfdt native interface always
refers to the offsets explicitly as offsets. For the bootwrapper
abstraction layer, unfortunately I'm stuck with the "devp" terminology
for the time being.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-10 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-10 3:23 [0/3] Merge libfdt into the bootwrapper David Gibson
2007-12-10 3:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] Merge libfdt upstream source David Gibson
2007-12-10 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] Use embedded libfdt in the bootwrapper David Gibson
2007-12-10 17:32 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-10 23:10 ` David Gibson [this message]
2007-12-10 23:19 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-10 23:27 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-10 23:32 ` David Gibson
2007-12-10 3:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] Kill flatdevtree.c David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071210231056.GC5495@localhost.localdomain \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).