From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] "NAND on UPM" and related patches
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:09:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071213140957.GA25401@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47604D6E.1050200@freescale.com>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 03:06:54PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
[...]
> >Given that, personally I'd want to lockless variant to stay.
> >
> >So, you still want to get rid of it?
>
> Yes, in the absence of benchmarking that shows it makes a real
> difference.
Benchmarking shows no difference in throughput between lock and
lockless variants. This is expected of course, flashes are slow,
so I can't really benchmark anything with it.
> Premature optimization being the root of all evil, and what
> not.
;-) Will remove it, thanks!
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@mail.ru
backup email: ya-cbou@yandex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-13 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-10 20:47 [PATCH RFC 0/7] "NAND on UPM" and related patches Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-10 20:48 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] [POWERPC] Implement GPIO API embryo Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-12 16:48 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-12 17:10 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-10 20:48 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] [POWERPC] QE: implement GPIO API Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-10 20:48 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] [POWERPC] CPM2: " Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-12 15:49 ` Jochen Friedrich
2007-12-12 16:03 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-12 16:56 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-10 20:49 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] [GPIO] Let drivers link if they support GPIO API as an addition Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-10 22:55 ` David Brownell
2007-12-10 23:04 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-02-22 23:42 ` David Brownell
2008-02-22 23:35 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-10 20:49 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] [POWERPC] FSL UPM: routines to manage FSL UPMs Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-10 20:49 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] [POWERPC][NAND] FSL UPM NAND driver Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-10 20:49 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] [POWERPC] MPC8360E-RDK: add support for NAND on UPM Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-10 23:03 ` David Gibson
2007-12-10 23:16 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-12 16:59 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-10 23:04 ` [PATCH RFC 0/7] "NAND on UPM" and related patches David Gibson
2007-12-10 23:10 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-11 0:36 ` David Gibson
2007-12-12 12:47 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-16 6:44 ` David Gibson
2007-12-12 16:39 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-12 16:40 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-12 16:55 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-12 16:54 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-12 20:58 ` Anton Vorontsov
2007-12-12 21:06 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-12 21:13 ` Scott Wood
2007-12-13 14:09 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2007-12-13 3:01 ` Chris Fester
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071213140957.GA25401@localhost.localdomain \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).