From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e33.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FF1DE05E for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:59:51 +1100 (EST) Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBDLxlJc006377 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:59:47 -0500 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id lBDLxlWR131776 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:59:47 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lBDLxlur016911 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:59:47 -0700 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:59:46 -0600 From: Josh Boyer To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/20] [POWERPC] pci32: 4xx embedded platforms want to reassign all PCI resources Message-ID: <20071213155946.0e0c39a0@weaponx> In-Reply-To: <1197581846.15741.183.camel@pasglop> References: <20071213073851.C321FDDFC9@ozlabs.org> <20071213130113.59342c40@weaponx> <1197578243.15741.150.camel@pasglop> <20071213144056.1a46b7a3@weaponx> <1197579177.15741.169.camel@pasglop> <20071213151138.02db0cd8@weaponx> <1197581846.15741.183.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:37:26 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:11 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Well, there is physical PCI hardware on the boards, yes. But what if > > people have no intention of using it? E.g. they have no devices, etc. > > Now we're requiring PCI support to be built into the kernel. > > > > I'm just being pedantic about keeping embedded tiny. > > Keeping your embedded design tiny (and thus your own BSP) is one thing, > but adding ifdef's all over the place so that somebody can tinify an > eval board, I'm less sure about this... but if you want, you can fixup > my patches. I'm not really advocating for ifdefs. If it annoys me enough (which I doubt it will), then I'd try to come up with some way to avoid those too. For now, I think selecting PCI in Kconfig for those boards is OK. josh