From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15722DDEE0 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:53:58 +1100 (EST) From: Stefan Roese To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/20] [POWERPC] pci32: 4xx embedded platforms want to reassign all PCI resources Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:48:41 +0100 References: <20071213073851.C321FDDFC9@ozlabs.org> <1197581846.15741.183.camel@pasglop> <20071213155946.0e0c39a0@weaponx> In-Reply-To: <20071213155946.0e0c39a0@weaponx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200712140648.41873.sr@denx.de> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 13 December 2007, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Keeping your embedded design tiny (and thus your own BSP) is one thing, > > but adding ifdef's all over the place so that somebody can tinify an > > eval board, I'm less sure about this... but if you want, you can fixup > > my patches. > > I'm not really advocating for ifdefs. If it annoys me enough (which I > doubt it will), then I'd try to come up with some way to avoid those > too. For now, I think selecting PCI in Kconfig for those boards is OK. Yes, I think it is OK to select it this way an those boards since they are evaluation boards with PCI slots. Ciao, Stefan